Profile
Search
Register
Log in
How is the Clinton administration to blame? At ALL?
View previous topic | View next topic >

Post new topic Reply to topic
Strange Famous Forum > Social stuff. Political stuff. KNOWMORE

Author Message
Dan Shay



Joined: 30 Aug 2003
Posts: 11242
Location: MN
 Reply with quote  

I know.

But, everyone gets the government they deserve.

the apathy is rampant, and therefore, it is under our watch. we just aren't watching.
Post Wed Apr 14, 2004 9:49 pm
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
MYOWNCLICHE



Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 3884
Location: In side YOUR head
 Reply with quote  

Dan Shay wrote:
I know.

But, everyone gets the government they deserve.

the apathy is rampant, and therefore, it is under our watch. we just aren't watching.


Well said
Post Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:14 pm
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
futuristxen



Joined: 01 Jul 2002
Posts: 19356
Location: Tighten Your Bible Belt
 Reply with quote  

prometheus_bound wrote:
Sage Francis wrote:
WHAT???

If he wasn't getting his dick sucked he would have taken care of our problems??

Sorry, that's idiotic. No.


man richard clarke said the shit himself that clinton was relucant to bomb the taliban because of "wag the dog" which was brought up in the public forum at the time of the monica scandal and that's just a fact. agree or disagree it's a fact nonetheless.


He was reluctant also because the last time he bombed he got killed for it, and the intellegence wasn't good enough for Clinton to trust it.

The diffrence between Bush and Clinton is that Clinton would have attacked Terrorism post 9/11 with the help of the world community, which in my opinion is the only way you can fight crime and terrorism. You need as many countries as possible working together sharing their intellegence.

Also that approach lessens the amount of hatred that is stirred up against the US. remember, initially after 9/11 we had the world's ear and sympathy, and terrorism is a world issue that many countries were already trying to address...but Bush spoiled that good will by fixating on Iraq.

Incidentally, Bush I had a similiar approach to world politics. Bush II and Reagan are very much heads of the same beast, both domestically and internationally.
Post Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:17 pm
 View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger
Dan Shay



Joined: 30 Aug 2003
Posts: 11242
Location: MN
 Reply with quote  

We funded the Taliban?

Y'all arguing about who didn't kill bin Laden.

What I'd like to know is who put him on the CIA payroll.

Along with Saddam.
also General Manuel Noreiga.

the last how many invasions sans Kosovo have been to take out people our country bankrolled or put in power.

They're great terrorists when they are working for the US, but when they aren't boy, a real headache.
Post Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:17 pm
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
prometheus_bound



Joined: 18 May 2003
Posts: 158
Location: arizona
 Reply with quote  

i found this little snippet of richard clarke on tim russert. i'm still looking for the whole thing.


now, this is the same president who, when he bombed afghanistan, when he bombed al-qaeda camps, because george tenet and i and sandy berger recommended he do it in order to get bin laden and the leadership team, where we thought they were going to be meeting, the reaction he faced to that was the so-called wag the dog phenomenon. no one in the media, tim, no one in the media, no one in the congress said, "oh, that's a great thing that you're retaliating for the attack on the united states," they said, "this is all about monica lewinsky, and this is all about your political problems."
Post Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:20 pm
 View user's profile Send private message
MYOWNCLICHE



Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 3884
Location: In side YOUR head
 Reply with quote  

[quote="futuristxen"]
prometheus_bound wrote:
Sage Francis wrote:
WHAT???

If he wasn't getting his dick sucked he would have taken care of our problems??

Sorry, that's idiotic. No.


..but Bush spoiled that good will by fixating on Iraq.

.


Who should he have fixatred on?
Post Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:20 pm
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
prometheus_bound



Joined: 18 May 2003
Posts: 158
Location: arizona
 Reply with quote  

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4608698/

it's the whole interview.
Post Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:24 pm
 View user's profile Send private message
MYOWNCLICHE



Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 3884
Location: In side YOUR head
 Reply with quote  

prometheus_bound wrote:
Dan Shay wrote:
This is democracy remember.


this aint no democracy.


You are right. Where did it go? I am so discussed with our government, I want to throw up, especially after paying my 2003 taxes
Post Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:28 pm
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
prometheus_bound



Joined: 18 May 2003
Posts: 158
Location: arizona
 Reply with quote  

i thought you were the conspiracy nut on here you should know...
Post Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:32 pm
 View user's profile Send private message
Dialectz



Joined: 30 Apr 2003
Posts: 1258
 Reply with quote  

A blowjob takes 30 minutes max.

Clinton tried his best to take out Laden w/o alerting the whole country.

Remember it was Clinton who advised Bush to attack the terrorist camps hours after the attack but Bush said no because "it would waste money".
Nearly 3 years later and billions of dollars gone, Bin Laden is still around.
Post Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:32 pm
 View user's profile Send private message
futuristxen



Joined: 01 Jul 2002
Posts: 19356
Location: Tighten Your Bible Belt
 Reply with quote  

[quote="MYOWNCLICHE"]
futuristxen wrote:
prometheus_bound wrote:
Sage Francis wrote:
WHAT???

If he wasn't getting his dick sucked he would have taken care of our problems??

Sorry, that's idiotic. No.


..but Bush spoiled that good will by fixating on Iraq.

.


Who should he have fixatred on?


I don't know... Actual terrorists...the world community was with us in Afghanistan, like "Yo get that fool!"...but then when we tried to go to Iraq and take out a sovereign leader because of WMD's(or whatever)...well that's when the cart fell off the road.
Post Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:38 pm
 View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger
MYOWNCLICHE



Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 3884
Location: In side YOUR head
 Reply with quote  

[quote="Dialectz"]A blowjob takes 30 minutes max.


Excuse me a 30 minute blow job? then you are doing something wrong. 15 max
Post Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:46 pm
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
prometheus_bound



Joined: 18 May 2003
Posts: 158
Location: arizona
 Reply with quote  

Dialectz wrote:
A blowjob takes 30 minutes max.

Clinton tried his best to take out Laden w/o alerting the whole country.



if he would have ignored the "wag the dog" chants and bombed afghanistan and still missed bin laden then he would have tried his best.

this thread is titled "how is the clinton administration to blame?" so i stated how i thought it was. if you want to start another entitled how is the bush administration to blame" i can run a list down. all of the administrations since regean have blood on their hands no one is innocent. bush the first is even to blame with his close ties to the saudis and working for the cia. who funded the taliban, who funded the freedom fighters which became al queda, who put the shah in power, who gave saddam the pre-cursors for wmds?

if you get the case check out a video called "inside the cia".
Post Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:59 pm
 View user's profile Send private message
MYOWNCLICHE



Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 3884
Location: In side YOUR head
 Reply with quote  

prometheus_bound wrote:
i thought you were the conspiracy nut on here you should know...


I do know

. And I got to suck the corporate cock in the morning so I am out tonite.
Post Wed Apr 14, 2004 11:17 pm
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sage Francis
Self Fighteous


Joined: 30 Jun 2002
Posts: 21493
 Reply with quote  

well, if it takes you 15 minutes then you are doing something wrong too.

But the key word was "max"

You don't think any President we ever had in the history of our country took some time to have sex? They all did. Some even dressed up as the opposite sex. That doesn't mean they weren't able to carry out their job still. We are animals.
Post Wed Apr 14, 2004 11:22 pm
 View user's profile Send private message

Post new topic Reply to topic
Jump to:  
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
All times are GMT - 6 Hours.
The time now is Wed Apr 16, 2014 5:18 am
  Display posts from previous:      


Powered by phpBB: © 2001 phpBB Group
Template created by The Fathom
Based on template of Nick Mahon